Assessments
Two ways to see where trust holds.
Both are free and self-serve, and both ask for your details before showing your results so we can follow up. Start with whichever question you're actually asking: how disciplined is our data and AI function overall, or how exposed is this one AI use case?
Data Discipline Assessment
Eight disciplines, ten minutes. A scored profile of your organisation's data and AI governance maturity, your critical constraints, and a three-horizon plan — not a generic scorecard.
AI USE-CASE DIAGNOSTICAI Readiness & Regulation Checker
Add your specific AI use cases and jurisdictions. Get a risk tier for each one, the reasons behind it, and the required controls mapped to the EU AI Act, GDPR and GCC data-protection law.
Which one should I start with?
Your organisation's overall data & AI governance maturity
A specific AI system's regulatory exposure
The organisation, across eight disciplines
Each AI use case you add, individually
About 10 minutes
About 10–15 minutes per use case
A scored profile and a three-horizon roadmap
A risk tier, reasons and required controls per use case
CDOs, CROs, boards, transformation leads
Product owners, compliance and legal reviewing an AI system
They work well together: the Data Discipline Assessment profiles the foundation your AI runs on, while the Regulation Checker tests each AI use case built on top of it. Neither replaces a formal legal or regulatory review — see the disclaimer on the Regulation Checker's results for more.
Want these findings validated with evidence?